Warning: Spoilers Ahead
My fiance asked me recently if I thought my test result would be Divergent were I to undergo the faction test from Veronica Roth’s book.
“Of course I would! Everyone would,” I said, “No one is as simplistic as the faction system makes them out to be.”
And that’s exactly the point of the book, in my opinion. When I saw the movie it resonated with me deeply, making me wonder what it was that kept me coming back for more. I’ve watched the movie three times, and read the first book for the first time, over the course of two weeks and this is what I’ve concluded:
Divergent‘s factions are built upon supposed innate differences between people. Yet as the narrative unfolds we see that things are not as neat and tidy as they seem. The organization of people into factions shows how society can exacerbate supposed “innate differences” between individuals to disastrous ends. We gradually unravel the weaknesses of the faction system and watch as it implodes upon itself.
If gender conflict or oppression exists in Veronica Roth’s world, I did not find it – at least not in book one or movie one! I found it incredibly refreshing to read a story that does not default itself to the same-old same-old sexist society (because it’s historically accurate! /s/) yet still addresses the fundamental problem of stereotypes. By creating a new brand of “stereotypical culture roles” using the faction system, it is easier for the message of how bad they are to come across. Much easier than trying to address the actual “stereotypical gender roles” insisted upon in our society. With a skilled hand, Veronica Roth has introduced the idea of socially constructed roles, and how detrimental they are, in a way that is entertaining.
Beatrice, or Tris, “fails” the faction test because she does not fall clearly into one of the categories. Instead she falls into several of them to varying degrees. In the beginning of the book Tris is still living in the Abnegation faction where she was born and raised. In Abnegation the forgetting of the self is of the utmost importance. Selflessness, humility, nonaggression, vegetarianism, and compassion are the ideals by which Abnegation faction members live. In other words, Abnegation by another name is our stereotypical understanding of the nature of femininity. And it chafes Beatrice as it chafes so many women in American society, past and present. Beatrice isn’t as selfless as she’s supposed to be. She doesn’t want to have to take care of everyone else all of the time. She’s selfish. And that’s actually a pretty healthy thing to be sometimes.
Instead of staying in Abnegation like she is told to do by her tester, Beatrice chooses the Dauntless faction. Dauntless are brave, strong, courageous, loud, fast, allowed to eat meat, and even considered dangerous. Dauntless by another name is our stereotypical understanding of the nature of masculinity. You could as easily say “Dauntless will be Dauntless” as say “boys will be boys.” And it fascinates Beatrice because it represents the opposite of everything she has been raised to be.
She wants to be heard. She wants to move her body and to exert power in the physical social sphere. She wants to be brave. She wants to be selfish! She wants to have fun! And in the world of Veronica Roth it is only a matter of which faction you are in that dictates whether you inhabit the “feminine” or “masculine” spaces. Faction association trumps everything else, including family, and including biological sex.
Tris is who we all want to be, we Millennials who are so revolutionary. We want to be the linchpin for change. We want to buck tradition. Yet when we enter the adult working world our surroundings are not so accommodating. We still win or lose by rules that previous generations wrote, much like the Divergent are hunted down in Tris’s world since they are deemed dangerous. The persecution of the nonconforming is a tale as old as time, yet still rings true to readers today.
Tris dares to be both Abnegation and Dauntless, going so far as to have the Abnegation symbol tattooed on her back covertly. A good part of the Tris’s character development revolves around how she comes to understand what Abnegation means to her, and how it is still a a part of her identity. She realizes that Dauntless and Abnegation don’t have to contradict one another, and that they can be complimentary and both reside within one person. To take the message further, “masculinity” and “femininity” are complimentary and can reside within one person without contradiction.
The character of Four takes this idea further. He purposefully and intentionally embraces all the factions and wants to be the best of each of them. He recognizes that as humans we limit ourselves by assigning labels for the sake of social order. Moreover, Four’s development throughout the story goes against the common themes we see in other young adult movies. He is a young man that provides support to Tris, but not once does his presence in the story undermine Tris’s agency and strength.
Yes, he is a love interest, but the love story is not the driving force behind the film. Yes, he does rescue her from being thrown over a cliff’s edge, but Tris is not a damsel in distress. And what’s more, he is vulnerable. He shows his fears AND he shows them willingly. His trust and openness with Tris gives readers a great example of how vulnerability can be a sign of strength, not weakness.
By the end of the story, it is clear that Tris and Four are neither wholly Abnegation nor wholly Dauntless. They are neither wholly feminine or wholly masculine. They are a mix of both, just like all of us are.
We are all Divergent.
Want more of Her Story Arc? Like us on Facebook.
10 thoughts on “We are ALL Divergent”
What I love most about Four and Tris’s characters is that both can still function even when apart. I love that. Tris slowly but surely gains her strength and confidence; Four slowly but surely opens up and faces his fears. They also complement each other.
I totally agree, it’s refreshing that each half of the couple is self-sufficient and whole. They actually demonstrate a healthy relationship, unlike some other YA fiction I know…
LikeLiked by 1 person
Exactly!!! And I love how Tris’s character evolved from someone unsure of herself to someone strong enough to make decisions and act on them.
Great post! I’m going to share it 😀 I saw the movie, but I haven’t read the book yet (which is into my read-wish-list atm). Stereotypes run rampant here! Again: great post.
Thanks! I really enjoyed the film (which I also saw first) but the book is good too. I hope you like it!
LikeLiked by 1 person
I’m sure I will 😉 I’ll read it after I finish the one I am reading at the moment (Felicia Day’s one) 😀
I know this post is older, but you put how I feel about Divergent into words so well that I had to comment on it. I’ve read a lot of the young-adult dystopias that have come after it and, despite nearly exclusively having female protagonist who attempt to make a change, none of them seem strong like Tris. Most of the time, I find them whiny and annoying, which is something I never associate with Tris, despite the somewhat similar scenarios. You did an incredible job describing how the faction system and Tris’ relationship with Four addresses and overcomes stereotypes. I also like how you related to Millennials, since that’s something that I’ve alway felt and have recently felt more as I’m about to graduate from college and am going to be looking for a professional job.
Thank you! Of all my posts on Her Story Arc, I’m actually most proud of this one. I put a lot of thought into the movie and the book, and I agree: Tris is exceptional in the realm of YA Dystopian fiction. I keep having urges to watch the movie, and I think it’s because I’ve been thirsty for this kind of heroine.
I love this post Lindsey! I used to think the only thing I didn’t like about the Divergent series was how ridiculous it was that they would be split up into the overly-simplistic factions…but you make an excellent point: “By creating a new brand of “stereotypical culture roles” using the faction system, it is easier for the message of how bad they are to come across. Much easier than trying to address the actual “stereotypical gender roles” insisted upon in our society.”
Thanks Celia! It took me awhile to figure out what it was I liked so much about the movie. I’d love to ask the author if she had any kind of intentional messaging or if it just ended up being that way