Today I want to discuss feminism and how it relates to humanism and egalitarianism.  The argument I have heard, and subsequently dwelled upon, can be summed up with the following questions:

Aren’t you for equality for everyone? Then why are you a feminist? Why aren’t you egalitarian? Or a humanist?

Have you ever been confronted with these questions? When I  travel down this line of thought and all the roads it produces, I do not find anything that immediately explains to me why I identify as a feminist first, and as an egalitarian/humanist second. I ask myself, if I am fighting for the same things as an egalitarian or humanist, why do I continue to identify as feminist?

To start, I want to define what all these terms mean. I acknowledge that the definitions I have chosen are not going to be everyone’s definitions.

Let’s start with feminism. According to Wikipedia:

Feminism is a collection of movements and ideologies aimed at defining, establishing, and defending equal political, economic, cultural, and social rights for women.[1][2] This includes seeking to establish equal opportunities for women in education and employment. A feminist advocates or supports the rights and equality of women.

Feminism is mainly focused on women’s issues, but author bell hooks and others have argued that, since feminism seeks gender equality, it must necessarily include men’s liberation because men are also harmed by sexism and gender roles.

Egalitarianism is defined:

either as a political doctrine that all people should be treated as equals and have the same political, economic, social, and civil rights[5] or as a social philosophy advocating the removal of economic inequalities among people or the decentralization of power. Some sources define egalitarianism as the point of view that equality reflects the natural state of humanity.

Humanism is defined as:

a philosophical and ethical stance that emphasizes the value and agency of human beings, individually and collectively, and generally prefers critical thinking and evidence (rationalism, empiricism) over established doctrine or faith (fideism). The meaning of the term humanism has fluctuated, according to the successive intellectual movements which have identified with it.[1] Generally, however, humanism refers to a perspective that affirms some notion of a “human nature” (sometimes contrasted with antihumanism).

I was a bit confused at this point regarding humanism, as its definition seems to change with the political winds. However, after perusing the internet a little bit, I have determined that the humanism in question is probably Secular Humanism:

The philosophy or life stance of secular humanism (alternatively known by some adherents as Humanism, specifically with a capital H to distinguish it from other forms of humanism) embraces human reason, ethics, social justice and philosophical naturalism, while specifically rejecting religious dogma, supernaturalism, pseudoscience or superstition as the basis of morality and decision making.[1][2][3]

It posits that human beings are capable of being ethical and moral without religion or a god. It does not, however, assume that humans are either inherently evil or innately good, nor does it present humans as being superior to nature. Rather, the humanist life stance emphasizes the unique responsibility facing humanity and the ethical consequences of human decisions.  Fundamental to the concept of secular humanism is the strongly held viewpoint that ideology—be it religious or political—must be thoroughly examined by each individual and not simply accepted or rejected on faith. Along with this, an essential part of secular humanism is a continually adapting search for truth, primarily through science and philosophy.

Here is how I think they all fit together:

Egalitarianism is the end goal, which is to treat everyone as equals.

Secular humanism is a belief that human beings should base their decision making on facts and observations rather than just accepting things as they are told to you.

Feminism uses the secular humanist mentality to sift through our patriarchal society in order to bring inequalities to light and move toward equality, aka egalitarianism. So humanism and egalitarianism aren’t so much as umbrellas under which we can place feminism, as they are all three intertwined. I identify as a feminist first because I want to be very clear to everyone that I acknowledge we still live in a patriarchal society, and that I am trying to change that. Egalitarianism is the end goal. Secular Humanism is part of the means. Feminism defines the current problem.

I’ll be post-feminist in a post-patriarchal society.


Want to keep up with Her Story Arc? Follow us on Facebook or Twitter

6 thoughts on “Humanism and Egalitarianism: are they Feminist Umbrellas?

    1. Hello Ejhorne – thank you for commenting! I appreciate the invitation, but I must respectfully decline. The focus of my blog is specifically feminism and fiction writing, and I do not want to divert attention from that topic to myself. But thank you for reaching out to me!


  1. Thank you for this definition, it was very interesting, and helped me in my own thought processes as to how I identify with the movements. I have been really enjoying your blog, and I am nominating you for the Liebster Award. The Liebster Award is awarded to bloggers with under 200 followers to try to promote their blog a little and bring together a community of bloggers. Its also a bit of fun! The rules of the competition are as follows:
1.) The nominated user must provide a link back to the person who nominated them.
This is my link: https://emilymiscellaneousme.wordpress.com/2014/05/28/the-liebster-award/
2.) Provide 11 facts about yourself.
3.) Answer 11 questions set by whoever nominated you.
4.) Choose 11 more people and ask them 11 questions.

    Liked by 1 person

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s